Services
Platform & infrastructure
Infrastructure that deploys itself, tells you when it is unhappy, and does not quietly cost triple what it should. Set up once, documented, and handed to your team.
Deploys that only one person can do
The symptoms are recognisable: releases happen at night because they are risky, one person knows the deploy steps and is a single point of failure, and you find out about outages from a customer rather than an alert. Underneath is usually infrastructure that was configured by hand in a console, which means it cannot be reproduced, reviewed or rolled back.
We set up infrastructure on AWS or Vercel, automate deployments, and put monitoring in place so you find out about problems before your customers do.
What you get
- Cloud infrastructure setup and IaC
- CI/CD automation
- Monitoring, logging, and alerting
- Load testing and cost optimization
How an infrastructure engagement runs
Describe the infrastructure in code
Everything gets defined in Terraform or the platform equivalent, so environments are reproducible and reviewable. Clicking around a cloud console creates infrastructure nobody can recreate after the person who built it leaves.
Automate the release path
Push to main, tests run, the build deploys, and a rollback is one command. When deploying is boring, teams deploy small changes often, which is what actually reduces risk.
Instrument before you need it
Logging, metrics, error tracking and alerts that reach a human. The goal is that you learn about a problem from a notification, not from a customer email, and that when you do there is enough detail to find the cause.
Load test and review cost
We find where it breaks under load before your traffic does, and go through the bill line by line. Idle overprovisioned resources are the most common finding, and usually the fastest saving.
What we work with
- AWS and Vercel
- Terraform
- GitHub Actions
- Docker
- Managed Postgres
- Metrics, logging and alerting
- Load testing
- Cost review
FAQ
Yes, and that is the more common engagement. We audit what exists, fix the parts that are fragile and bring the rest under version control incrementally. Migrating a running system to a new provider is rarely worth it unless there is a specific reason.
Not as a standalone service. We set up alerting and runbooks so your team can respond, and during a support window after launch we are reachable for incidents. Ongoing production on-call is better handled by people in your timezone who own the system daily.
Often, though we will not promise a number before seeing the account. The usual wins are rightsizing instances that were provisioned for imagined peak load, deleting resources nobody remembers creating, and moving static assets somewhere cheaper. We show the before and after.
Have a product that needs to ship?
Tell us where things stand and what you're trying to hit. We'll respond within one business day with next steps.